PUP Relocation GroupPublic Utility Plant
Queensland · Public Utility Plant Relocation

Utility relocation is what puts your project behind programme.

We take public utility plant off the critical path. We run the investigation, negotiate with the asset owners, manage the relocation design through approval, and inspect the works until the asset owner accepts them back. We do not dig. We run the process that gets it done.

Bring us in at concept, not when the excavator hits something. Authority approval cycles do not compress because a contractor is behind.

ROAD RESERVE - EXISTING PUP PROPOSED STRUCTURE RELOCATED ALIGNMENT
A typical corridor conflict, with existing plant colour-coded to the Australian service marking convention. Two clashes, two relocation alignments, four asset owners, four separate approval paths.
MRTS170 / 171The TMR specifications we work to
AS 5488.1 & .2:2022Subsurface utility information & SUE
QL-A before designVerified in the ground before a relocation is designed
s.79 TIA 1994The statutory trigger we work under
Electricity Communications Gas Water Sewerage Drainage
The work, plainly

What public utility plant relocation actually is

Under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994, public utility plant is plant permitted under another Act to be on a road: the water, sewer, gas, electricity and telecommunications assets already sitting in the corridor. When a road, busway, rail or streetscape project needs that ground, the plant has to move, be protected in place, or be abandoned.

01

It is rarely an engineering problem

The pipe can be moved. What holds projects up is the approval cycle behind it: scoping, quoting, deeds, design endorsement and outage windows, each owned by a different authority with its own timeframe.

02

Every asset owner is a different negotiation

A carrier under the Telecommunications Act works nothing like a distributor under the Electricity Act, which works nothing like a water service provider under the Planning Act. One project, four or five separate legal pathways.

03

Discovered late, it is the critical path

A relocation identified at concept is a line item. The same relocation discovered during construction is a claim, a variation, a stood-down crew and a cutover window pushed into storm season.

Capability

Three things, held by one accountable person

PUP Relocation Group is a principal-side coordination and inspection service. Most projects buy investigation, authority coordination and construction supervision from three different suppliers and spend the programme reconciling them. We hold the process end to end, so what gets located is what gets designed, and what gets designed is what gets built and accepted.

Investigate & assess

Find out what is actually down there, to a defensible standard, before anyone designs around it.

  • BYDA enquiries and records reconciliation across every affected asset owner
  • QL-B corridor locating scoped, procured and managed with specialist locating contractors
  • QL-A potholing scoped, witnessed and surveyed at every clash point
  • Utility conflict reports issued per asset owner, not one combined PDF
  • Clash registers against the civil, structural and drainage design
  • Subsurface utility information quality-coded to AS 5488 and issued into the project model

Coordinate & approve

Own the authority relationships so the project team does not have to.

  • Utility Relocation Management Plan to MRTS171, inside the 28 days
  • Relocation scoping, quotation and cost apportionment negotiation
  • Relocation agreements, deeds and indemnities administered on the principal's behalf
  • Design submission and endorsement through each authority's gates
  • Road corridor and traffic permits, LAAN notices, permits to enter
  • Outage and cutover booking, held against the master programme

Inspect & hand back

The relocation works supervised from IFC to acceptance, on the principal's side of the table.

  • Relocation and protect-in-place options assessment
  • Relocation design managed through concept, detail and authority endorsement
  • Works inspected against the asset owner's specification and MRTS170
  • Hold and witness points, ITP sign-off and non-conformance close-out
  • Live connections, shutdowns and cutovers coordinated between the asset owner and the contractor
  • As-constructed survey, ADAC data and handover accepted first time

What we deliberately do not do. We do not excavate, bore, lay conduit or connect services. The physical works are done by the asset owner's contractor or the project's head contractor, to the asset owner's standard. Staying independent of the construction is what lets us represent the principal and tell you plainly when a programme, a quotation or a design is not going to land.

How it runs

The relocation journey, start to finish

Nobody in this industry publishes this, which is exactly why clients are surprised by it. Durations below are indicative and vary by asset owner, scope and season, but they are the shape of the thing.

1

Desktop & BYDA 1 to 2 weeks

Every affected asset owner identified, plans retrieved and reconciled against as-builts and the project's survey. This is QL-D, records only. We treat it as a hypothesis, not an answer.

2

QL-B corridor locating 2 to 4 weeks

Electromagnetic and GPR sweep of the corridor by a specialist locator, surveyed and quality-coded. This is where records and reality part company, and where most of the project's future variations are already sitting.

3

Clash assessment 1 to 2 weeks

Located services overlaid against the civil, structural and drainage design. Each conflict classified: relocate, protect in place, or no action. Nothing goes to an authority until this is settled.

4

QL-A potholing 2 to 3 weeks

Non-destructive excavation at every clash point, exposed and surveyed. Only QL-A validates a service. Designing a relocation off QL-B at a critical clash is how projects end up back here anyway, three months later.

5

Options and cost 2 to 4 weeks

Relocation versus protection assessed on cost, programme and outage risk. Budget estimates prepared before the number is locked, not after.

6

Authority engagement 4 to 12 weeks

Formal approach to each asset owner. Scope agreed, quotation requested, cost apportionment argued. This is the long pole, it runs at the authority's pace, and it is the single best reason to start early.

7

Agreements executed 4 to 10 weeks

Relocation deeds, third party agreements and indemnities negotiated and signed. Runs in parallel with design where the authority allows it.

8

Relocation design to IFC 6 to 14 weeks

Concept through detailed design, coordinated against the project documentation and taken through the authority's review and endorsement. Certified where the authority requires RPEQ sign-off.

9

Permits and access 4 to 6 weeks

Road corridor permits, traffic control permits, permission to enter for private property, body corporate notice, environmental approvals. Lodged in parallel, not in series.

10

Construction, inspected Scope dependent

The physical relocation is built by the asset owner's contractor or the head contractor, to the asset owner's specification and under the project's HSE requirements. We inspect it: hold points witnessed, protection works checked, and anything the asset owner will reject at handover picked up while the trench is still open.

11

Live connection & cutover Booked window

Shutdown or cutover coordinated between the asset owner and the contractor inside the approved window, with customer notification and contingency. Miss the window and the next one may be a month or a season away.

12

As-constructed & handover 2 to 4 weeks

Survey, as-constructed drawings, ADAC asset data and completion documentation packaged to the authority's requirements. The job is not finished until the asset owner has accepted the asset back.

Who we work for

Two clients, two entirely different worries

A relocation only works when both are satisfied. We work the same job from both sides of the table.

Project proponents & head contractors

You need the ground clear on a date

Councils, TMR, alliances and Tier 1 delivery teams. Your exposure is programme and cost, and utilities are the item most likely to blow both.

  • Relocations built into the master programme from day one
  • One accountable contact across every authority on the job
  • Early warning on approvals that will not land in time
  • Costs and authority quotations chased before budget lock
  • An auditable trail behind every approval and variation
Asset owners & utility authorities

You need your asset returned intact

Energex and Ergon, Unitywater and Urban Utilities, Telstra, Optus, NBN Co, APA. Your exposure is asset integrity, standards compliance and the paperwork holding it together.

  • Works inspected against your specification, not a generic civil standard
  • Design submissions that arrive complete the first time
  • Outage windows respected and contingency planned
  • As-constructed and ADAC data in your required format
  • A counterpart who knows your process before the first meeting
Track record

Where this experience comes from

PUP Relocation Group is a new company. The people in it are not. Our director has run the utilities interface on live Queensland streetscape and transport corridor projects, on the client side of the table with the asset owners.

Case study · Sunshine Coast

First Avenue Streetscape

Sunshine Coast Council · Maroochydore, QLD

A major CBD streetscape upgrade through a fully serviced corridor. Utility relocation sat on the critical path from the outset: a Telstra conduit lift gating a 900mm stormwater run, which in turn gated the Energex road crossings and the Stage 2 works window. Our director ran the utilities interface, coordinating every asset owner, chasing the approvals, and keeping the relocation sequence honest against a zero-float programme.

7Asset owners coordinated in parallel
Zero floatAccelerated programme held to
Per-ownerConflict reports, not one combined pack

Asset owners engaged

Energex Unitywater Telstra Optus NBN Co TPG Sunshine Coast Council

Work delivered

  • Utility conflict reporting Per authority
  • SUE clash modelling QL-B vs QL-A
  • Relocation coordination Multi-utility
  • Under-bore approvals NBN / Energex
  • Permission to enter Private property
  • Live works & cutover coordination Water main
Case study · Sunshine Coast

Caloundra Transport Corridor Upgrade

Sunshine Coast Council · Caloundra, QLD

A multi-package transport corridor upgrade through an established, fully serviced urban corridor, delivered under a head contractor. Relocations span Energex transmission and distribution network assets alongside Unitywater water and sewer mains, each designed and endorsed by the asset owner ahead of construction. The utilities interface here is the principal-side one: keeping the customer and principal activities moving so the contractor is never waiting on an approval, and coordinating the live cutovers and outages that only the asset owners can perform.

PackagedRelocations sequenced across delivery packages
HV to sewerTransmission, distribution, water and sewer
Live cutoversOutages and cutovers coordinated with each asset owner

Asset owners engaged

Energex Unitywater Sunshine Coast Council

Work delivered

  • Principal-side relocation coordination Transmission & distribution
  • Principal-side relocation coordination Water & sewer
  • Asset owner endorsement Design & approvals
  • Contractor interface Head contractor
  • Cutover coordination Live network

Project experience described here was gained by our director on the projects named. Client references are available on request.

Compliance

The documents this work actually runs on

If a contractor cannot name these, they have not done a relocation on a Queensland state-controlled road.

MRTS171 · July 2025

Public Utilities in Road Projects: Principal Contractor Responsibilities

Requires a Utility Asset Coordination Representative with a minimum five years' relocation experience, and a Utility Relocation Management Plan within 28 days of tender acceptance.

MRTS170 · July 2025

Public Utilities in Road Projects: Site Works

Installation and protection of public utility plant within the state-controlled road corridor, including busways and cycle lanes. Sets the vibration and protection requirements near live plant.

AS 5488.1:2022 & AS 5488.2:2022

Classification of Subsurface Utility Information & SUE

The quality level framework, QL-D through QL-A. Only QL-A, physically exposed and surveyed, validates a subsurface utility. We quality-code every deliverable.

Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 (Qld)

s.79 · Chief executive's requirements for public utility plant

The statutory power to require a utility owner to relocate plant, with s.83 allowing the chief executive and the owner to share the cost by agreement. This is what creates the work.

Electricity Act 1994 (Qld)

ss.99, 102 to 106 · Works on roads and alteration of position

s.106 lets a public entity require an electricity entity to alter the position of its works. s.99 is the notice obligation on anyone working near them.

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Schedule 3 · Carrier powers and immunities

Why carriers are handled differently from state utilities, and why relocation of a carrier asset is at the requesting party's expense.

BYDA

Before You Dig Australia

The national referral service, formerly Dial Before You Dig. Plans are indicative only and carry an expiry. The duty of care stays with the excavator, which is why we insist on potholing.

QDC MP1.4

Building over or near relevant infrastructure

The instrument that governs water and sewer build-over and adjacency in Queensland, referred through Unitywater and Urban Utilities.

Straight answers

The questions everyone asks

Who pays for a public utility plant relocation in Queensland?

It depends on the asset and the tenure. For telecommunications carriers, the position is settled: the requesting party pays, under the Telecommunications Act 1997. For plant on a state-controlled road, s.79 of the Transport Infrastructure Act directs the owner to carry out the work, and s.83 lets the chief executive and the owner share the cost by agreement, so it is negotiated. For water and sewer, relocations generally run through connections and development agreements and are requestor-funded.

The rule of thumb: the party whose works make the relocation necessary usually bears the cost, subject to the statutory cost-sharing provisions and whatever tenure the utility holds. The negotiation is where the money is, and it is worth having someone in it who has done it before.

How early should we bring you in?

Concept design. The authority approval cycle in stage 6 of our process runs four to twelve weeks and does not compress. If a relocation is identified during construction, that entire clock starts from zero while a crew stands around.

The cheapest utility work on any project is the QL-B survey nobody wanted to pay for at concept.

Why not just use the BYDA plans?

Because they are indicative only, they carry an expiry date, and the duty of care stays with the excavator regardless. BYDA is a referral service. It holds no asset data itself, it passes your enquiry to the member asset owners, and non-member and private assets do not appear at all.

BYDA plans are QL-D under AS 5488. They are the right starting point and the wrong basis for a design.

What is the difference between QL-B and QL-A, and do we need both?

QL-B is geophysical: electromagnetic locating and GPR, surveyed, to a stated horizontal tolerance. It tells you where things approximately are, across the whole corridor. QL-A is physical: the service is exposed by non-destructive excavation and surveyed, and it is the only quality level that validates a utility.

You need both, in that order. QL-B across the corridor to find the conflicts, then QL-A at each conflict before you design a relocation around it.

Do you do the physical relocation works?

No, and that is deliberate. The excavation, boring and pipework is done by the asset owner's contractor or the project's head contractor, to the asset owner's standard. What we hold is everything around it: the investigation, the approvals, the design coordination, the inspection and the handover.

Keeping us independent of the construction is what lets us sit on the principal's side of the table and tell you when a programme is not going to hold.

Where do you work?

Based on the Sunshine Coast and working Queensland-wide. Our recent project experience is concentrated in South East Queensland: Sunshine Coast, Moreton Bay and Brisbane.

Get in touch

Tell us what is in the way

Where the project is, who the asset owners are, and when you need the ground clear. We will tell you what is realistic, including when it is not.

Phone 0414 454 015
Contact Jason Bastow, Director
Based Mooloolaba, Queensland

Or call 0414 454 015. We would rather talk it through.